When the Dems decided to run a black man against a white woman, you knew this was going to happen:
“Women have just experienced the ultimate betrayal,” NOW’s New York State chapter said in a scorching rebuke. “Senator Kennedy’s endorsement of Hillary Clinton’s opponent in the Democratic presidential primary campaign has really hit women hard.”
That’s right, the Dems have put their own members in the impossible situation of either being anti-women or anti-black.
Of course, this entire “problem” could be resolved if libs grew a brain and realized that not voting for someone is not the same thing as hating that person. But in the way that liberals view the world, you are racist, sexist, homophobic, or whatever if you do not vote for a person who is of a particular race, sex, or sexual orientation…regardless of the reasons why you do not vote for that person.
They are trying to do the same thing to the Republicans. Witness: if you don’t like Romney, you’re anti-Mormon. Thankfully, Republicans are not (for the most part) idiots, and therefore reject the dubious logic used by the media.
Oh well. Now that Thompson is out of the race, I have to say that I really don’t like anyone at all who is running for pres these days. On a scale of 1 to 10, Dems are a 4 and Republicans are a 5. None of them are worth putting in office.
On the other hand, the president is mainly a figurehead anyway. All you need is 67 members of Congress (enough to override vetos) and 5 Supreme Court justices to agree with you. If you have 72 people who are in agreement on an issue, that’s what becomes law, period.
Kinda scary when you think about it that way…
