Comments on: Looking at TANG http://calvindude.com/dude/2006/04/12/looking-at-tang/ The Theological and Philosophical Musings of CalvinDude Tue, 22 May 2012 21:30:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: John W. Loftus http://calvindude.com/dude/2006/04/12/looking-at-tang/#comment-18 John W. Loftus Wed, 12 Apr 2006 21:26:06 +0000 http://calvindude.com/dude/blog/2006/04/looking-at-tang/#comment-18 I just posted this at Debunking Christianity Blog: (http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2006/04/bad-taste.html) and I just wanted you to read it. <em>Look CalvinDude, you’ve been warned before. This is it. One more post making the same argument that you make every time you post and you’ll be banned. If you have nothing further to contribute you will no longer be allowed to post here. Wear that as a banner and post it on your Blog for the one or two people who go there a day, if you want to. We have heard your argument and we have dealt with it over and over and over. We reject it. Now move on. It’s that simple. Listen, the one argument for the existence of the Christian God that could prove God exists, if true, is the ontological argument. It has the very best chance. But it fails….see here. Yours does a hundred times over. There is actually an ontological argument for the non-existence of a necessary being too. What if we were to respond to every argument you have on behalf of your faith with that argument? Wouldn’t it be tiring? Your argument is tiring to us here too. This is your last warning. I’ve been more than fair with you.</em> I just posted this at Debunking Christianity Blog: (http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2006/04/bad-taste.html) and I just wanted you to read it.

Look CalvinDude, you’ve been warned before. This is it. One more post making the same argument that you make every time you post and you’ll be banned.

If you have nothing further to contribute you will no longer be allowed to post here. Wear that as a banner and post it on your Blog for the one or two people who go there a day, if you want to.

We have heard your argument and we have dealt with it over and over and over. We reject it. Now move on. It’s that simple.

Listen, the one argument for the existence of the Christian God that could prove God exists, if true, is the ontological argument. It has the very best chance. But it fails….see here. Yours does a hundred times over.

There is actually an ontological argument for the non-existence of a necessary being too. What if we were to respond to every argument you have on behalf of your faith with that argument? Wouldn’t it be tiring? Your argument is tiring to us here too.

This is your last warning. I’ve been more than fair with you.

]]>